
Of the apps for tracking performance while exercising, Strava has the best features.
As far as capturing signal, Strava has the quickest response. It picks up signal when the other apps don’t, or can’t. This is kind of important since the activity of mountain biking happens in faraway places. This is not me educating you, the reader. I’m telling all two of the employees of the IT division of any company starting or continuing a performance measuring app. “You gotta be able to get signal. That’s the number one most important feature.”
So, now that they know, we can rest assured that every company wanting to design and publish a fitness tracking app for mountain biking will perfect the signal capture first and foremost. You’re welcome.
Another thing Strava does finest is that they offer multiple map styles. You can switch from an overhead view to a 3D view, or about four other styles. As far as the other apps go, I haven’t seen one which offers as many map styles.
The playback feature on Strava is perfect for those moments when you want to relive your ride. Of course you have to imagine yourself as a little orange line going up and down and around the mountain, but it is still fun to watch the progress sometimes.
Sadly, there are drawbacks to Strava. One is that there is a way for people to create “segments”. Segments are what they sound like: portions of the trail. When people create these segments, they often name them with the same naming style as used by the county planners who should never be allowed to name trail systems. You know, the kind of people who don’t ride, but want to shovel their influence on everyone and everything around them. With names such as: Tree Trail, Windy Line, and Stan’s Cutoff, you’d think they wanted to scare people off the trails.
Segments are often shorter than a tenth of a mile. What possible purpose could that have? Is there really someone out there riding a 32nd of a mile multiple times? Is this mysterious person trying to get faster each time? “Yaaaay! I did it in two pedal strokes, instead of three like last time.”
Anyway, I ignore the segments now. They interested me once upon a time, but now that I know the general gist of them, I can see that they are meaningless mindlessness.
All anyone really needs is the time of travel, the time of recording the ride, travel speeds, and comparisons with previous runs on the same trail. These are all things which Strava performs well.
Strava works well for runners too. I have a few friends who enjoy running. They use Strava for running and say it works well for giving them an idea how their runs went or how they can improve. There isn’t an app (that I know about) that can track you while swimming.
As far as apps for recording rides go, I like MTB Project second, and Trailforks comes in at a close third. There are some features mentioned above that either of these two apps could improve and then they would secure the spot as my new favorite. (Both of these have had a hard time picking up signal, when Strava did it easily.)
So for now, Strava remains the best.









